Story: why GEORGE exists
Core idea: the real conflict is not ERP vs. MES — it’s the absence of a neutral, governed decision layer. ERP optimizes intent. MES optimizes physical reality. Without an explicit decision architecture between them, optimization turns into structural conflict, hidden trade-offs, and silent inconsistency.
ERP optimizes intent
Cost, delivery commitments, sourcing constraints, inventory, contractual obligations — the “economic plan” of the enterprise.
- Expedite vs. cost trade-off
- Supplier constraints & lead times
- Order priorities and promise dates
MES optimizes reality
Takt time, downtime, quality gates, scrap/rework loops, OEE, WIP — the “physical truth” of the factory.
- Line stop, rework routing
- Quality containment decisions
- Capacity and resource availability
GEORGE makes trade-offs explicit
GEORGE does not “integrate systems”. It orchestrates decisions: ranks priorities dynamically, applies constraints, enforces authority, writes a decision trace, and produces auditable action proposals.
GEORGE is the governed decision layer between ERP intent and MES reality.